You are given an array of non-overlapping intervals intervals
where intervals[i] = [starti, endi]
represent the start and the end of the ith
interval and intervals
is sorted in ascending order by starti
. You are also given an interval newInterval = [start, end]
that represents the start and end of another interval.
Insert newInterval
into intervals
such that intervals
is still sorted in ascending order by starti
and intervals
still does not have any overlapping intervals (merge overlapping intervals if necessary).
Return intervals
after the insertion.
Note that you don’t need to modify intervals
in-place. You can make a new array and return it.
Example 1:
Input: intervals = [[1,3],[6,9]], newInterval = [2,5] Output: [[1,5],[6,9]]
Example 2:
Input: intervals = [[1,2],[3,5],[6,7],[8,10],[12,16]], newInterval = [4,8] Output: [[1,2],[3,10],[12,16]] Explanation: Because the new interval [4,8] overlaps with [3,5],[6,7],[8,10].
Constraints:
0 <= intervals.length <= 104
intervals[i].length == 2
0 <= starti <= endi <= 105
intervals
is sorted bystarti
in ascending order.newInterval.length == 2
0 <= start <= end <= 105
Approach 01:
-
C++
-
Python
#include <vector> #include <algorithm> using namespace std; class Solution { public: vector<vector<int>> insert(vector<vector<int>>& intervals, vector<int>& newInterval) { int n = intervals.size(); vector<vector<int>> result; int i = 0; while (i < n && intervals[i][1] < newInterval[0]) { result.push_back(intervals[i]); i++; } while (i < n && intervals[i][0] <= newInterval[1]) { newInterval[0] = min(newInterval[0], intervals[i][0]); newInterval[1] = max(newInterval[1], intervals[i][1]); i++; } result.push_back(newInterval); while (i < n) { result.push_back(intervals[i]); i++; } return result; } };
from typing import * class Solution: def insert(self, intervals: List[List[int]], newInterval: List[int]) -> List[List[int]]: n = len(intervals) result = [] i = 0 while i < n and intervals[i][1] < newInterval[0]: result.append(intervals[i]) i += 1 while i < n and intervals[i][0] <= newInterval[1]: newInterval[0] = min(newInterval[0], intervals[i][0]) newInterval[1] = max(newInterval[1], intervals[i][1]) i += 1 result.append(newInterval) while i < n: result.append(intervals[i]) i += 1 return result
Time Complexity:
- Initial Traversal: \( O(n) \)
- We iterate through the intervals list up to three times:
- The first
while
loop runs in \( O(n) \) time, where \( n \) is the number of intervals, as it iterates through the list until it finds an interval that overlaps withnewInterval
. - The second
while
loop also runs in \( O(n) \) time, as it merges all overlapping intervals withnewInterval
. - The final
while
loop runs in \( O(n) \) time, as it adds the remaining intervals to the result list.
- Overall Time Complexity: \( O(n) \)
Since each interval is processed a constant number of times, the overall time complexity is \( O(n) \).
Space Complexity:
- Result List: \( O(n) \)
- Overall Space Complexity: \( O(n) \)
The space complexity is primarily determined by the space needed to store the result list, which can be at most \( n + 1 \) intervals in the worst case, where \( n \) is the number of original intervals.
Since the only additional space used is the result list, which can store up to \( n + 1 \) intervals, the overall space complexity is \( O(n) \).